DISQUS

DISQUS Hello! Typical Mac User Podcast Forum is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.

Community Page

Jump to original thread »
Author

TMUP 135: Rapid Weaver 4, Terminal Part 8 and MacSparky too

Started by typicalmacuser · 1 year ago

 
 Standard Podcast [00:34:58m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download


Call the Listener Hotline 951-281-6332

Tonight’s show is brought to you by:

Ambrosia Software
This show is a member of Friends In Tech

Show Notes:

Rapid Weaver 4

MacSparky.com
Like what you read or heard? Share ... Continue reading »

7 comments

  • I love RapidWeaver and have used it for my podcast and my personal blogs for over two years. RapidWeaver4 is an awesome upgrade and was surprised I didn't have to pay to upgrade from 3.6. Thanks for covering this great app, Victor.

    Check out our RW sites.

    http://mattbeckwith.com
    http://pizzagohere.com
    http://makenzy.com
    http://emilybeckwith.com
  • Victor,
    Thanks for the segment on RapidWeaver I'm definitely going to be checking it out. RapidWeaver maybe be exactly what I'm look for... Something between iWeb and WordPress.
    Robert
  • Although I've not yet listened to this episode Victor, i don't have many good things to say about RW4. RW4 is not a complete web development application standing on its own. I've been trying to put up a simple site for my father for a few weeks and have found that I need to download extra plugins to get the functionality I need. No direct HTML editing is a big problem for me. The plugins almost always cost extra. Although I paid for RW and several plugins I should have saved it for Dreamweaver. In my opinion the lack of control in RW is not offset by ease of use.
  • Really love that you expressed your opinion here. This is exactly what comments are for. Thanks for sharing your thoughts with the community. That is what it's all about.
  • Since I typed my comments on my iPhone while waiting for a haircut today, I'd like to take this opportunity to clarify my statement about Rapidweaver 4. I think that the developers didn't intend for it to be a complete Web development application. Additional shortcomings include a poorly written manual, and a non-intuitive interface. I kind of feel like a hypocrite saying these things because I did PAY for it and more than a few plug-ins, but I remember thinking that the the trial version was crippled somehow and paying the shareware fee would "unlock" ease of use. I was sadly mistaken.
    Sorry for the additional rant, but I can't think of anything positive to say about RW4.
  • Granted I have spent very little time with RW4, I downloaded the trial and started to feel my way around it. You're right, not very intuitive, but I do have a sense of the power behind the curtain, so to speak. Certainly this is a big step up from iWeb in allowing you to "step out of the box". As far as I can tell the trial is not crippled but rather limited to creating just 3 pages. This limitation will not get in the way of me fully exploring its capabilities. I do have a concern as to what may have been left out that will need supplementing via the payed add-ons.
    Robert
  • Right RW4 is not for the brand new person but I've seen pages done on it that were incredible. I'm working on a couple myself, so.. I'd say like we said in the interview it's not for the new but a great gap filler between iWeb and Dreamwever, in my opinion for the price it can't be beat.

Add New Comment

Returning? Login